Project overview

The main objective of the “Dynamics of youth employment precarity: drivers, trajectories, and outcomes in a cross-national perspective” project is to analyse the prevalence, determinants, and life-course effects of early career precarious employment in Poland, Germany, the U.K., and the United States. In order to overcome the limitations of previous research on non-standard employment contracts and job / labour market uncertainty, we propose a conceptualization of precarious employment as a career sequence, consisting of periods of recurring non-employment and frequent job terminations, combined with low and / or unstable incomes from work. The studies conducted within this project aim to:

a. propose a measurement of precarious labour market trajectories for various categories of youth based on the stability of their employment relationships and the persistence of low earnings,
b. unravel the complex mechanisms affecting both the risk of entering precarious labour market trajectories and moving into secure employment under different national welfare and employment regimes,
c. assess the socio-economic consequences of such trajectories, taking into account conditional relationships which have not been given sufficient attention in earlier studies,
d. understand the ways in which micro-level changes in the employment patterns of individuals are reflected in macro-level changes in the social structure.
For the purpose of cross-national analyses of precarious labour market careers, the project implements a common layout for the organization of employment career data from panel surveys. The new Cross National Biographies – Young (CNB-Young) datasets, created by harmonizing biographical data for people aged up to 35 from the four countries covered by the study, are the first quantitative datasets covering full employment histories of respondents starting from their first job, and containing information on their education, changes in household composition, income, and health / well-being. The source data come from renowned, long-standing longitudinal surveys: the Polish Panel Survey (POLPAN), the German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP), the U.K. Household Longitudinal Study – Understanding Society (UKHLS), and the U.S. NLSY79 Young Adult Survey. To ensure comparability of data collected in different countries, we apply harmonization procedures, which involve constructing control indicators reflecting differences in the original data and recording changes (e.g., rescaling, recoding) made to the source variables.

In addition, to enable a systematic analysis of cross-country differences, the project gathers relevant contextual data characterising the legal regulations and institutional settings of the four countries under study over the past years. Including this information in the quantitative analyses allows to assess how the interplay of various individual characteristics and institutional factors affect workers’ chances of moving into secure employment, or mitigate the possible negative life-course outcomes of early career instability.


Antonucci, L. 2018. Not all experiences of precarious work lead to precarity: the case study of young people at university and their welfare mixes. Journal of Youth Studies 21(7): 888-904.
Blossfeld, H.-P., E. Klijzing, M. Mills, K. Kurz, eds. 2005, Globalization, Uncertainty and Youth in Society. The Losers in a Globalizing World, London / New York: Routledge.
Booth, A.L., M. Francesconi, J. Frank. 2002. Temporary jobs: stepping stones or dead ends? The Economic Journal 112(480): F189–F213.
Brzinsky-Fay, C. 2007. Lost in Transition? Labour Market Entry Sequences of School Leavers in Europe. European Sociological Review 23(4): 409-422.
DiPrete, T. 2002. Life course risks, mobility regimes, and mobility consequences: A comparison of Sweden, Germany, and the United States, American Journal of Sociology 108, 267-309.
Doogan, K. 2009. New Capitalism? The Transformation of Work. Cambridge: Polity
Dubrow, J.K., I. Tomescu-Dubrow. 2016. The rise of cross-national survey data harmonization in the social sciences: emergence of an interdisciplinary methodological field. Quality & Quantity 50(4): 1449–1467.
Gangl, M. 2004. Welfare states and the scar effects of unemployment: a comparative analysis of the United States and West Germany, American Journal of Sociology 109, 1319-1364.
Gash, V. 2008. Bridge or trap? Temporary workers’ transitions to unemployment and to the standard employment contract. European Sociological Review 24(5): 651–68.
Gebel, M. 2010. Early career consequences of temporary employment in Germany and the UK. Work, Employment and Society 24(4): 641-660.
Giesecke, J., M Groß. 2003. Temporary Employment: Chance or Risk? European Sociological Review 19(2): 161-177.
Häusermann, S., T. Kurer, H. Schwander. 2015. High-skilled outsiders? Labor market vulnerability, education and welfare state preferences. Socio-Economic Review 13(2): 235–58
Kiersztyn, A. 2016. Fixed-Term Employment and Occupational Position in Poland: The Heterogeneity of Temporary Jobs, European Sociological Review 32(6): 881-894.
Kiersztyn, A. 2017. Non-standard employment and subjective insecurity. How can we capture job precarity using survey data? in Precarious Work, Research in the Sociology of Work Series, edited by A. Kalleberg, S. Vallas, 91-122, Emerald Publishing.
Sawiński, Z. 2016. Occupational Careers and Job Interruptions: On Methodological Issues of Constructing Long Trajectories. International Journal of Sociology 46(4): 244-263.
Slomczynski, K.M., I.Tomescu-Dubrow. 2018. Basic Principles of Survey Data Recycling. In Advances in Comparative Survey Methodology: Multinational, Multiregional and Multicultural Contexts (3MC), edited by T.P. Johnson, B-E Pennell, I. A. L. Stoop, B. Dorer, 937-962, Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley.
Slomczynski, K.M., T.K. Krauze, Z. Peradzyński. 1988. The Dynamics of Status Trajectory: A Model and Its Empirical Assessment. European Sociological Review 4(1): 46–64.
Slomczynski, K.M., I. Tomescu-Dubrow, Z. Sawiński. 2012. Modeling Occupational Careers for a Turbulent Economy From Simple to Complex Approaches. International Journal of Sociology 42(4): 56–70
Slomczynski, K.M, I. Tomescu-Dubrow, J.C. Jenkins, M. Kołczyńska, P. Powałko, I. Wysmułek, O. Oleksiyenko, M.W. Zieliński, J.K. Dubrow. 2016. Democratic Values and Protest Behavior. Harmonization of Data from International Survey Projects. Warsaw: IFiS Publishers.
Vogel, J. 2002. European welfare regimes and the transition to adulthood: A comparative and longitudinal perspective. Social indicators research 59(3): 275-299.